The fresh lookup strategy followed this new ‘Fellow Report on Electronic Search Strategies’ (PRESS) guideline

A clinical feedback and you can meta-investigation was in fact achieved adopting the methodology out of ‘Common Revealing Points to possess Medical Product reviews and Meta-Analyses’ (PRISMA) [19, 20].

Document lookup and you can choices

A quest was achieved anywhere between , inducing the set of the next databases: Knowledge Resources Suggestions Cardiovascular system (ERIC), through ProQuest; Mental Suggestions (PsycINFO), via APA PsycNET; Scientific Literature Study and you can Retrieval Program (MEDLINE), thru ProQuest; Scopus, via Elsevier; and you will ISI Internet out-of Technology (WoS Core Range), via Thomson Reuters. The expression ‘sexting’ found in earlier in the day remark knowledge [step one, 2, 4, 11, 15, 22–24] was applied as an excellent descriptor so you’re able to choose a critical number of degree while it began with certain medical industries, such as those out of Mindset, Education, Sociology, Tech, Fitness Sciences and you will Courtroom Sciences. In order to provide a full opinion, a beneficial ‘gray literature’ look was achieved with the Bing and Yahoo Student search engines towards after the terms: “sexting”, “sext”, “sexual messaging” and you may “intimate messaging”. Per week alerts have been set for brand new look inside PsycINFO, Websites out of Science, and you may Scopus, up to . The new site listing away from relevant empirical stuff and reviews was as well as looked to recognize almost every other potentially qualified studies. At exactly the same time, i called corresponding writers through e-post and you will/otherwise ResearchGate in order to request full-texts or even to assemble more information on the studies (six out-of 17 solicitations was basically responded cliquez sur ce lien maintenant, and you will 3 satisfied our very own demands). So you’re able to helps replication from the comment, S1 Desk comes with the specific lookup strategy utilized in per database consulted.

Introduction and exception requirements

According to the mentioned objectives associated with look, training were incorporated if they: a) aligned to examine the latest frequency from sexting and you may/otherwise the correlates; b) comprised a sample out-of users as much as 18 yrs . old; c) provided completely new empirical study; and you will d) was obtainable in English otherwise Foreign-language. Concerning your addition expectations a good), three you can easily incidence rates was indeed noticed with regards to for each and every study, relevant correspondingly into particular methods out-of: sending; receiving; and you will forwarding.

Very first, content meeting the fresh addition conditions have been picked, and you can, whenever behavior cannot be made on the label and you can conceptual alone, an entire papers is retrieved also. The new chosen documentation have been appeared by themselves by article authors CME and you may ELG. Any inaccuracies was basically solved as a result of dialogue having a 3rd blogger (JML) in which expected.

Other education considering investigation in the same research study was indeed provided on condition that the new attempt or even the measure of sexting differed one of them. S2 Desk summarizes the fresh new omitted training, while you are Fig 1 depicts the fresh new flowchart of clinical remark processes. The studies as part of the meta-research try referenced during the S1 Appendix.

Analysis coding

To have coding objectives, the following study, in addition to bibliometric recommendations plus the look procedures of unique education, is recorded: a) variety of publication (knowledge or master thesis, post otherwise report, peer-examined, maybe not peer-reviewed otherwise lower than feedback); b) season regarding guide of your own research; c) 12 months of information collection; d) geographical provider of your own products categorized based on eight-continent model: Africa, Asia, Europe, America, South usa, Antarctica and you can Oceania/Australia; e) data framework (cross-sectional or longitudinal questionnaire); f) sort of sample (probabilistic otherwise non-probabilistic); g) site inhabitants (e.grams., preadolescents, secondary school college students, students); h) test proportions and you will proportion of women; i) assortment, imply and you will simple deviation of chronilogical age of the participants; j) government processes (mobile or face-to-face interview, on the web, paper-centered otherwise mixed questionnaire); k) content articles (text messages, images/clips, otherwise both); l) level of intimate explicitness of the stuff (nude, maybe not naked, both); m) framework where sexting is actually practiced (connection, other people or otherwise not outlined); n) determination of the members within the sexting strategies (sending: volunteer, perhaps not voluntary, not laid out; receiving: solicited, unsolicited, not discussed; forwarding: with consent, instead consent, maybe not outlined); o) schedule of the measure of sexting (? six months or > 6 months, lifetime, or otherwise not outlined); and you will p) sexting step frequency overall performance (giving, finding, forwarding).